Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Nikon S9900 versus Sony W230, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and W230 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S9900 was unveiled 6 years later than the W230 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the S9900 scores versus the W230 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Sony W230
| S9900 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 73 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Nikon S9900
| W230 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Sony W230
| S9900 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9900 versus Sony W230 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S9900 versus the W230.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and W230 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and W230.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S9900 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S9900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9900 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 156g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $180 |