Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Nikon W300 and Olympus SH-50, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the SH-50 (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe W300 was revealed 4 years later than the SH-50 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the W300 matches up against the SH-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus SH-50
| W300 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 54 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Nikon W300
| SH-50 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus SH-50
| W300 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon W300 comes with outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Nikon W300 and Olympus SH-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the W300 versus the SH-50.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and SH-50 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the W300 and SH-50.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent W300 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SH-50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | - | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 15s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $387 | $300 |