Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Photography Glossary Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe W300 was manufactured 7 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the W300 matches up vs the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| W300 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 91 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Nikon W300
| Tough-3000 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus Tough-3000
| W300 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon W300 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the W300 against the Tough-3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and Tough-3000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon W300 to give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern W300 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon W300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $387 | $0 |
