Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Nikon W300 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe W300 was introduced 4 years after the TG-830 iHS which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the W300 grades against the TG-830 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| W300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 54 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Nikon W300
| TG-830 iHS | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| W300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 provides physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Nikon W300 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the W300 and the TG-830 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the W300 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you should expect similar quality of files but you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern W300 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $387 | $0 |