Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320
55 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Introduced February 2006
- Superseded the Nikon D100
- Replacement is Nikon D300
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Nikon D200 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the D200 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the D200 (APS-C) and VR-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe D200 was announced 6 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D200 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the D200 matches up against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D200 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Nikon D200 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Olympus VR-320
D200 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon D200
VR-320 | D200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | February 2006 | Fresher by 65 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Nikon D200 and Olympus VR-320
D200 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon D200 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") and a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon D200 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the D200 vs the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D200 and VR-320 is 55 and 94 respectively.
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the D200 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The D200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older D200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Nikon D200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon D200 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-02-23 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Nikon F | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 309 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 920 gr (2.03 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 583 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-EL3e | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 to 20 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $999 | $179 |