Clicky

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
55
Imaging
48
Features
45
Overall
46
Nikon D200 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon D200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
  • Introduced February 2006
  • Superseded the Nikon D100
  • Replacement is Nikon D300
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Nikon D200 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the D200 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the D200 (APS-C) and VR-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The D200 was announced 6 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D200 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the D200 matches up against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Olympus VR-320

 D200 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon D200

 VR-320 D200 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2006Fresher by 65 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Nikon D200 and Olympus VR-320

 D200 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon D200 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") and a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Nikon D200 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the D200 vs the VR-320.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D200 and VR-320 is 55 and 94 respectively.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the D200 and VR-320.

Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The D200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older D200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
52
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
33
good resolution (14MP)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Nikon D200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
55
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon D200
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Nikon D200 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
51
environment proofing
has built in flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than others (158g)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Nikon D200 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
52
focusing manually
change lenses (Nikon F mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon D200
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
9
no video recording
32
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
lighter than others (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon D200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D200 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon D200Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon D200 Olympus VR-320
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2006-02-23 2011-07-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 3872 x 2592 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type Nikon F fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 309 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.63x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 920 gr (2.03 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 64 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 583 not tested
Other
Battery model EN-EL3e LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 to 20 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Retail price $999 $179