Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520
67 Imaging
64 Features
63 Overall
63
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Nikon D3100
- New Model is Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Nikon D3200 versus Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the D3200 (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe D3200 was revealed 3 years after the E-520 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the D3200 scores versus the E-520 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon D3200 & Olympus E-520. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon D3200 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Olympus E-520
| D3200 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 |  | August 2008 | More modern by 48 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon D3200
| E-520 | D3200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-520
| D3200 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon D3200 comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has proportions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Nikon D3200 versus Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the D3200 against the E-520.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the D3200 and E-520 is 67 and 68 respectively.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the D3200 and E-520.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The D3200 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Nikon D3200 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The younger D3200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Nikon D3200 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon D3200 | Olympus E-520 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-07-25 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 3 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 309 | 45 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 505 grams (1.11 pounds) | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 81 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.1 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.2 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 1131 | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 540 images | 650 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $530 | $400 |