Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200
69 Imaging
66 Features
72 Overall
68
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 430g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon D3200
- Replacement is Nikon D3400
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by companies Nikon and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the D3300 (24MP) and A200 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (APS-C).
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe D3300 was manufactured 5 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the D3300 grades against the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D3300 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon D3300 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3300 over the Sony A200
| D3300 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2014 |  | July 2008 | More recent by 71 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Nikon D3300
| A200 | D3300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3300 and Sony A200
| D3300 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon D3300 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 430 grams (0.95 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the D3300 against the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3300 and A200 is 69 and 66 respectively.
Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the D3300 and A200.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon D3300 to show more detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer D3300 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon D3300 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Nikon D3300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon D3300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-04-21 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Nikon F | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 309 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD (160 degree viewing angle) | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 430 gr (0.95 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 82 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.3 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 1385 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 700 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL14a | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $500 | $100 |
