Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300
59 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 765g - 136 x 107 x 76mm
- Announced March 2015
- Superseded the Nikon D7100
- Updated by Nikon D7500
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300, both Advanced DSLR cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the D7200 (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D7200 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) have different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe D7200 was launched 10 years after the E-300 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the D7200 grades against the E-300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon D7200 Gallery and Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D7200 over the Olympus E-300
| D7200 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 |  | January 2005 | More modern by 124 months |
| Screen size | 3.2" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.4") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 134k | Clearer screen (+1095k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D7200
| E-300 | D7200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300
| D7200 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon D7200 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 107mm x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 765 grams (1.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-300 has proportions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the D7200 and the E-300.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the D7200 and E-300 is 59 and 67 respectively.
Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the D7200 and E-300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The D7200 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Nikon D7200 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 16 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent D7200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
| Nikon D7200 | Olympus E-300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon D7200 | Olympus E-300 |
| Also Known as | - | EVOLT E-300 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2015-03-02 | 2005-01-10 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 51 | 3 |
| Cross type focus points | 15 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 309 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,229k dots | 134k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, auto FP high-speed sync, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, rear-curtain sync, rear-curtain w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye reduction w/slow sync, slow sync, off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 765g (1.69 pounds) | 624g (1.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 107 x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 87 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1333 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 1110 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL15 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (two slots) | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $800 |