Clicky

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
59
Imaging
66
Features
82
Overall
72
Nikon D7200 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Nikon D7200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 765g - 136 x 107 x 76mm
  • Announced March 2015
  • Superseded the Nikon D7100
  • Updated by Nikon D7500
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300, both Advanced DSLR cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the D7200 (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D7200 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) have different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The D7200 was launched 10 years after the E-300 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the D7200 grades against the E-300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D7200 over the Olympus E-300

 D7200 E-300 
IntroducedMarch 2015January 2005More modern by 124 months
Screen size3.2"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.4")
Screen resolution1229k134kClearer screen (+1095k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D7200

 E-300 D7200 

Common features in the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300

 D7200 E-300 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon D7200 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 107mm x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 765 grams (1.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-300 has proportions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the D7200 and the E-300.

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the D7200 and E-300 is 59 and 67 respectively.

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the D7200 and E-300.

To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The D7200 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Nikon D7200 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 16 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent D7200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D7200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
79
you can focus manually
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Nikon D7200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
63
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proof
very good ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon D7200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
71
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
MP count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
good battery (1,110 shots)
comes with phase detect AF
slow fps (6.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon D7200 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
68
good battery (1,110 CIPA)
environment proof
MP count good (24MP)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon D7200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
78
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
screen is a good size (3.2")
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
no anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
good battery (1,110 CIPA)
has double storage slots
no image stabilization
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon D7200
Vlogging with Olympus E-300
30
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone port
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
9
no video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon D7200 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D7200 and Olympus E-300
 Nikon D7200Olympus E-300
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon D7200 Olympus E-300
Also Known as - EVOLT E-300
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Announced 2015-03-02 2005-01-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed 4 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 25600 400
Highest boosted ISO 102400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 51 3
Cross type focus points 15 -
Lens
Lens support Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 309 45
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.2 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of screen 1,229k dots 134k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.63x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, auto FP high-speed sync, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, rear-curtain sync, rear-curtain w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye reduction w/slow sync, slow sync, off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 765g (1.69 pounds) 624g (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 107 x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 87 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.6 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1333 not tested
Other
Battery life 1110 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL15 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (two slots) Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Card slots Dual One
Launch cost $1,100 $800