Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9
79 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Revealed June 2021
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Z fc (21MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the Z fc (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z fc was manufactured 3 years later than the E-PL9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Nikon Z fc being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Z fc matches up against the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z fc & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon Z fc Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Olympus E-PL9
Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2021 | February 2018 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Nikon Z fc
E-PL9 | Z fc |
---|
Common features in the Nikon Z fc and Olympus E-PL9
Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z fc has got outer measurements of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
See the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Z fc against the E-PL9.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z fc and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z fc and E-PL9.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Z fc due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Nikon Z fc will deliver extra detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Z fc is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2021-06-28 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 51200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 204800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 209 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 21 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 380 grams (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL25 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $949 | $599 |