Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9
79 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
85 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Revealed June 2021
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Z fc (21MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the Z fc (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z fc was manufactured 3 years later than the E-PL9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Nikon Z fc being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Z fc matches up against the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z fc & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon Z fc Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Olympus E-PL9
| Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2021 | February 2018 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Nikon Z fc
| E-PL9 | Z fc |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z fc and Olympus E-PL9
| Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z fc has got outer measurements of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
See the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Z fc against the E-PL9.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z fc and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z fc and E-PL9.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Z fc due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Nikon Z fc will deliver extra detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Z fc is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
| Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2021-06-28 | 2018-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 51200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 204800 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 209 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 21 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 380 grams (0.84 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL25 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $949 | $599 |