Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9
79 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
85 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Revealed June 2021
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Z fc (21MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the Z fc (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z fc was manufactured 3 years later than the E-PL9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Nikon Z fc being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Z fc matches up against the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z fc & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon Z fc Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Olympus E-PL9
| Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2021 | February 2018 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Nikon Z fc
| E-PL9 | Z fc |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z fc and Olympus E-PL9
| Z fc | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z fc has got outer measurements of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
See the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Z fc against the E-PL9.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z fc and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z fc and E-PL9.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Z fc due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Nikon Z fc will deliver extra detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Z fc is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
| Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2021-06-28 | 2018-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 51200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 204800 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 209 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 21 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 380 grams (0.84 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL25 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $949 | $599 |