Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320
74 Imaging
68 Features
84 Overall
74
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 397g - 127 x 94 x 60mm
- Released October 2019
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Z50 (21MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the Z50 (APS-C) and TG-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z50 was brought out 7 years later than the TG-320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Nikon Z50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Z50 matches up versus the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon Z50 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z50 over the Olympus TG-320
| Z50 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2019 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 95 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon Z50
| TG-320 | Z50 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-320
| Z50 | TG-320 |
|---|
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z50 offers physical dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Z50 against the TG-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z50 and TG-320 is 74 and 94 respectively.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z50 and TG-320.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Z50 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Nikon Z50 will provide you with more detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer Z50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Nikon Z50 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Z50 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2019-10-10 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed 6 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 209 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Nikon Z | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 15 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 397 grams (0.88 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 94 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL25 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $857 | $0 |