Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810
74 Imaging
68 Features
84 Overall
74
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 397g - 127 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed October 2019
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z50 (21MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the Z50 (APS-C) and TG-810 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z50 was revealed 8 years after the TG-810 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Nikon Z50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Z50 scores against the TG-810 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are provided at Nikon Z50 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z50 over the Olympus TG-810
| Z50 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2019 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 100 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Nikon Z50
| TG-810 | Z50 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z50 and Olympus TG-810
| Z50 | TG-810 |
|---|
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon Z50 features external dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Z50 compared to the TG-810.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z50 and TG-810 is 74 and 92 respectively.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z50 and TG-810.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z50 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Nikon Z50 will result in extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer Z50 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Nikon Z50 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Z50 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2019-10-10 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 6 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 209 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon Z | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 15 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 397 grams (0.88 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 127 x 94 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 220 shots |
| Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL25 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $857 | $428 |
