OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2022
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below is a complete overview of the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe OM System OM-5 was introduced 13 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the OM System OM-5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the OM System OM-5 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for OM System OM-5 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are viewable at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
OM System OM-5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2022 | November 2009 | More recent by 158 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the OM System OM-5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | OM System OM-5 |
---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
OM System OM-5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The OM System OM-5 features outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the OM System OM-5 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 80 and 77 respectively.
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The visual below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the OM System OM-5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The OM System OM-5 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the OM System OM-5 will render greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher OM System OM-5 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-10-26 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 119 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/3200s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,200 | $566 |