Clicky

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
80
Imaging
64
Features
88
Overall
73
OM System OM-5 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Released October 2022
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Below is a complete overview of the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The OM System OM-5 was introduced 13 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the OM System OM-5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the OM System OM-5 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 OM System OM-5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedOctober 2022November 2009More recent by 158 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k920kSharper display (+120k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the OM System OM-5

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro OM System OM-5 

Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 OM System OM-5 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display sizing3.00"3"Equivalent display measurement

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The OM System OM-5 features outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the OM System OM-5 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 80 and 77 respectively.

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The visual below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the OM System OM-5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The OM System OM-5 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the OM System OM-5 will render greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher OM System OM-5 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

OM System OM-5 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
78
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
55
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

OM System OM-5 Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography advice
84
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
weather sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with OM System OM-5
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
76
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery power (310 per charge)
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

OM System OM-5 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
78
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
provides focus by touch
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (310 per charge)
49
built-in flash
terrible battery (320 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

OM System OM-5 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography features
78
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3.00")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
bad battery power (310 per charge)
46
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

OM System OM-5 Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging information
84
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have mic jack
20
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 OM System OM-5Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model OM System OM-5 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2022-10-26 2009-11-10
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 119 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3.00 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/3200s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 gr (0.91 lb) 453 gr (1.00 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 320 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $1,200 $566