Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 6000, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 5 years earlier than the 6000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-300 grades vs the 6000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus 6000
E-300 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-300
6000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 54 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus 6000
E-300 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 6000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eb81/2eb817ff12852e3f4ddf8f6972166cc8846ccbdb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and 6000 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7f98/b7f987e846ec8def6e2a71fd6441887b0eaaccdd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and 6000.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus 6000 will produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3a10/f3a10096943f946235ac442de1c95d72eced1539" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70711/7071175e260753e90333a025251899d9b97d6299" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $800 | $259 |