Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2, former is a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-1 was launched 7 years before the E-P2 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-1 grades against the E-P2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 & Olympus PEN E-P2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus E-P2
| E-1 | E-P2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-1
| E-P2 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2010 | November 2003 | Newer by 77 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus E-P2
| E-1 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 enjoys physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-1 compared to the E-P2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and E-P2 is 59 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and E-P2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus E-P2 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2010-04-22 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $799 |