Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-P1
- Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2, former is a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was launched 7 years before the E-P2 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-1 grades against the E-P2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 & Olympus PEN E-P2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus E-P2
| E-1 | E-P2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-1
| E-P2 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2010 | November 2003 | Newer by 77 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus E-P2
| E-1 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 enjoys physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-1 compared to the E-P2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and E-P2 is 59 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and E-P2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus E-P2 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2010-04-22 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $799 |