Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-1 was brought out 6 years before the SP-565UZ and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-1 matches up against the SP-565UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-1 | SP-565UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-1
SP-565UZ | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | November 2003 | More recent by 62 months |
Screen size | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-1 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 has got physical dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-1 versus the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7128/c71285ecf671cf8b9c9367daefd8f6c1711ee95d" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and SP-565UZ is 59 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a79b/0a79b9d4a1c1ab9555c0c7af3e84355fe8f76904" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SP-565UZ will resolve more detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/405a2/405a23b4e3acdc8c9ac38aaac1b7928b16ac5f7b" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d2c2/8d2c26845f6a6a26a45a1d1b43f1a0217ea5137c" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $400 |