Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68076/68076f64aea446dc770a37f6b8beaf83f554abcb" alt="Ricoh CX5 front Ricoh CX5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The CX5 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-4 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the CX5 matches up against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX5 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-4
CX5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Ricoh CX5
WG-4 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 31 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-4
CX5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh CX5 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the CX5 vs the WG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3fe6/d3fe6ad1da81165a5c08f84d8354b07527fc43e0" alt="Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX5 and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/683c1/683c151ed0b7a53941632f96e6cb0a977039f50b" alt="Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX5 and WG-4.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to offer more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f896/8f896475a60e3a3228996b07b91a6eecd25eb890" alt="Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2db5f/2db5f7b00d8b9aec935484c96c8618143d92b0e3" alt="Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $330 |