Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
72 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Refreshed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 428g - 124 x 84 x 74mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Succeeded the Panasonic G1
- Replacement is Panasonic G3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-1 versus Panasonic G2, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and G2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-1 was revealed 7 years before the G2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Panasonic G2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-1 grades versus the G2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Panasonic G2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Panasonic G2
| E-1 | G2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G2 over the Olympus E-1
| G2 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | November 2003 | Fresher by 80 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic G2
| E-1 | G2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-1 offers exterior dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Panasonic G2 has specifications of 124mm x 84mm x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-1 versus Panasonic G2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-1 against the G2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and G2 is 59 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and G2.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Panasonic G2 to produce extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic G2 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2010-07-12 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 124 x 84 x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 493 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $1,000 |