Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and WG-10 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and WG-10 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was launched 10 years before the WG-10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-1 scores against the WG-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 and Pentax WG-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Pentax WG-10
| E-1 | WG-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus E-1
| WG-10 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | November 2003 | Fresher by 116 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Pentax WG-10
| E-1 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 offers external measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-10 has proportions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-1 vs the WG-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and WG-10 is 59 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and WG-10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-1 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-10 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 0.7 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 1.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $0 |