Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- Refreshed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Announced September 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-1 was brought out 11 years before the QX1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-1 matches up vs the QX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 and Sony Alpha QX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony QX1
| E-1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 1.8" |  | " | Larger display (+1.8") |
| Display resolution | 134k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+134k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-1
| QX1 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | November 2003 | More modern by 131 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony QX1
| E-1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-1 enjoys physical dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-1 versus the QX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and QX1 is 59 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and QX1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-1 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony QX1 will result in greater detail having its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus E-1 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 134k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 216 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $500 |
