Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-1 versus Sony TX200V, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was announced 9 years earlier than the TX200V and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the E-1 matches up vs the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony TX200V
E-1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-1
TX200V | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | November 2003 | More recent by 99 months | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 134k | Crisper screen (+1096k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony TX200V
E-1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 has exterior dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-1 versus Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-1 and the TX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and TX200V is 59 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and TX200V.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-1 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will result in more detail with its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $500 |