Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced August 2010
- Replacement is Sony A35
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-1 was revealed 7 years before the A33 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-1 matches up vs the A33 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Sony SLT-A33. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony A33
| E-1 | A33 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-1
| A33 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | November 2003 | More recent by 82 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 134k | Clearer screen (+787k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony A33
| E-1 | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-1 has got exterior measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Sony A33 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-1 compared to the A33.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and A33 is 59 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and A33.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-1 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony A33 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A33 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Sony SLT-A33 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2010-08-24 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lbs) | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 591 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $230 |
