Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
67 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 528g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2012
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the FZ150 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was announced 3 years prior to the FZ150 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ150 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the 9000 grades versus the FZ150 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic FZ150
9000 | FZ150 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ150 over the Olympus 9000
FZ150 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 35 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic FZ150
9000 | FZ150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ150 has dimensions of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 528 grams (1.16 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 9000 and the FZ150.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and FZ150 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and FZ150.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos but you might want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic FZ150 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-04-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 528 grams (1.16 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 132 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $499 |