Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was manufactured 8 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-3 matches up vs the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-870
E-3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-3
TG-870 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | February 2008 | Newer by 95 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-870
E-3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has got physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-3 vs the TG-870.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and TG-870 is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and TG-870.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $670 | $280 |