Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-3 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TG-310 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-3 grades vs the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-3
| TG-310 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | February 2008 | Newer by 35 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-310
| E-3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the TG-310.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and TG-310 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and TG-310.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-310 will give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $670 | $0 |