Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-3 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TG-310 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-3 grades vs the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-3
| TG-310 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | February 2008 | Newer by 35 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-310
| E-3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-3 against the TG-310.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and TG-310 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and TG-310.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-310 will give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $670 | $0 |