Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was brought out 5 years prior to the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-3 scores against the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-3
TG-820 iHS | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | February 2008 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-3 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-3 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and TG-820 iHS is 56 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will produce more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,030k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $670 | $500 |