Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was revealed 6 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-3 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-3
| TG-2 iHS | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | February 2008 | More modern by 65 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-3 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and TG-2 iHS is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-3 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $670 | $380 |