Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd7f/ffd7f68f44b62cc6692afbe8663d94e19abfcd45" alt="Olympus Tough TG-6 front Olympus Tough TG-6 front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 12 years before the TG-6 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-3 scores versus the TG-6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-6
E-3 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-3
TG-6 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2019 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 136 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-6
E-3 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-3 vs the TG-6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ff3/d1ff33846cf5a28fb85daa2d28d2d7f96eded990" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and TG-6 is 56 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af30f/af30f4e7a1c3fe0b8b92b8640b08363ec921a971" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and TG-6.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-6 will offer more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/242a1/242a18a34a5510b8e1ae6a7f23b9de286ede550f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c096a/c096a6610aa6b6c25d7d804c2f912871319b875e" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2019-05-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 253 grams (0.56 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $670 | $449 |