Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-3 and Olympus VG-145, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-3 was manufactured 4 years before the VG-145 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-3 matches up versus the VG-145 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus VG-145
E-3 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-3
VG-145 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 41 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus VG-145
E-3 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 provides physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 and Olympus VG-145 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 against the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff4f/7ff4ffebe629d44aabfe83e658acb5b506c2b725" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and VG-145 is 56 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f576c/f576c682aa5b93b61a1fd55afa34d69143ac7e9f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The image here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and VG-145.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cee7/7cee71a3213a76dab3b634d39b3ce4dbbd05d094" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd9e5/bd9e55d637fa838724e68ca5229a63f3f504a451" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus VG-145 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $670 | $0 |