Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Olympus E-3 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Introduced February 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-3 was revealed 4 years prior to the VR-330 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-3 scores against the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-3 VR-330 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-3

 VR-330 E-3 
IntroducedFebruary 2011February 2008Fresher by 36 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus VR-330

 E-3 VR-330 
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 provides outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-3 vs the VR-330.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and VR-330 is 56 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and VR-330.

Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will deliver more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-3
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
57
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
33
good resolution (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-3
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
70
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
58
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography factors
55
weather proofing
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
doesn't have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-3
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
56
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
small screen (2.5 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging information
18
no video shooting
32
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-3Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-3 Olympus VR-330
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2008-02-20 2011-02-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 grams (1.96 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 571 not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $670 $220