Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FX75, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was launched 3 years earlier than the FX75 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-3 matches up against the FX75 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FX75
E-3 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-3
FX75 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | February 2008 | Newer by 27 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FX75
E-3 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 features exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-3 compared to the FX75.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FX75 is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FX75.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $670 | $139 |