Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was released 3 years earlier than the FZ35 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-3 matches up vs the FZ35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-3 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-3
FZ35 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | February 2008 | More recent by 28 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ35
E-3 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 offers exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has measurements of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 vs the FZ35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FZ35 is 56 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and FZ35.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ35 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 8.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $670 | $999 |