Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd313/dd313ff47bd137e5fd5d7c986ffd7f948ade844f" alt="Pentax Q front Pentax Q front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Introduced June 2011
- Updated by Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 versus Pentax Q, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and Q (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and Q (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL9 was revealed 6 years later than the Q and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL9 scores vs the Q when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Pentax Q. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax Q
E-PL9 | Q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2011 | More recent by 81 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus E-PL9
Q | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax Q
E-PL9 | Q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Pentax Q has specifications of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 versus Pentax Q in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the Q.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/132f4/132f4cfd193defa7b0e26bd533d05eb45ffb1e33" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and Q is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28999/289995988d47a5b229f0d73db4a2f4745cac2f12" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and Q.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will produce extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32add/32add039f7627e90b798e69b9e2e70a853f80203" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb789/bb789d9f71ffddcfa7728fc2e16677ce6e2d63fe" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax Q Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Q | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Q |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2011-06-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Total lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 47 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 189 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 230 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $695 |