Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Pentax Optio RZ10 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Introduced February 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-1
  • Successor is Olympus E-5
Pentax RZ10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
  • Introduced July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and RZ10 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-3 was brought out 4 years earlier than the RZ10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-3 scores versus the RZ10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax RZ10

 E-3 RZ10 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-3

 RZ10 E-3 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2008Fresher by 41 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ10

 E-3 RZ10 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Pentax RZ10 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-3 and the RZ10.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and RZ10 is 56 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and RZ10.

As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax RZ10 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography advice
Pentax RZ10 Portrait photography advice
56
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10MP)
35
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Street photography camera
Pentax RZ10 as a Street photography camera
69
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 Sports photography details
Pentax RZ10 Sports photography details
57
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery pack (178 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography features
Pentax RZ10 Travel photography features
55
weather sealing
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
lack of Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
66
environment proofing
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (178 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 Landscape photography advice
Pentax RZ10 Landscape photography advice
56
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
small screen (2.5 inches)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery pack (178 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Vlogging camera
Pentax RZ10 as a Vlogging camera
18
can't record video
28
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ10
 Olympus E-3Pentax Optio RZ10
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-3 Pentax Optio RZ10
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2008-02-20 2011-07-19
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 2.80 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 gr (1.96 lbs) 178 gr (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 571 not tested
Other
Battery life - 178 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $670 $200