Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d326/3d326fe67688157fb2aebf791c12ec2b776718f1" alt="Pentax Optio RZ18 front Pentax Optio RZ18 front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ18, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and RZ18 (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and RZ18 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-3 was brought out 4 years earlier than the RZ18 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax RZ18 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-3 scores vs the RZ18 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Pentax Optio RZ18. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax RZ18
E-3 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus E-3
RZ18 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ18
E-3 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 features external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ18 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 and Pentax RZ18 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-3 compared to the RZ18.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/854fc/854fce9e7938533532c0ef546dfe4c884ff30fbf" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and RZ18 is 56 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1131a/1131a57ce4c252a9974f8d840cd962313d708aa1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The photograph below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and RZ18.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Pentax RZ18 will deliver more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4391b/4391b847b41828eb796301c00a63d510de1dd27f" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd38/3dd38f2a07486f86d55361b54ee865d72454c86a" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 178 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $670 | $210 |