Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
56 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below is a extended review of the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-3 was revealed 20 months earlier than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-3 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| E-3 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-3
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | February 2008 | More recent by 20 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| E-3 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 has external measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-3 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 56 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-3 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $670 | $566 |