Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-3 was announced 3 years before the HZ35W which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-3 matches up against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-3
| HZ35W | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 28 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 provides physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-3 vs the HZ35W.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and HZ35W is 56 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and HZ35W.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Samsung HZ35W will give extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $670 | $300 |