Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung ST100, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ST100 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ST100 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-3 was announced 22 months before the ST100 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-3 matches up against the ST100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Samsung ST100
| E-3 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Olympus E-3
| ST100 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2008 | Newer by 22 months |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Samsung ST100
| E-3 | ST100 |
|---|
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 enjoys external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 versus Samsung ST100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-3 and the ST100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and ST100 is 56 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and ST100.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST100 will offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-3 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Samsung ST100 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $670 | $250 |