Clicky

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290

Portability
56
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Olympus E-3 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Launched February 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Previous Model is Sony A230
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-3 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the A290 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-3 grades vs the A290 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony A290

 E-3 A290 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-3

 A290 E-3 
AnnouncedJune 2010February 2008Newer by 28 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony A290

 E-3 A290 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 features exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 and the A290.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and A290 is 56 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and A290.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A290 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-3 Portrait photography information
Sony A290 Portrait photography information
56
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
65
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-3
Street photography with Sony A290
69
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-3 Sports photography details
Sony A290 Sports photography details
57
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather proof
has phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-3 Travel photography factors
Sony A290 Travel photography factors
55
weather proof
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
53
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (290 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A290 as a Landscape photography camera
56
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
small screen (2.5")
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
58
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
doesn't have liveview
not so great battery power (290 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-3
Vlogging with Sony A290
18
no video recording
9
no video recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-3 and Sony A290
 Olympus E-3Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-3 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2008-02-20 2010-06-09
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 890 gr (1.96 lbs) 549 gr (1.21 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 66
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 11.5
DXO Low light rating 571 615
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $670 $600