Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
66 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-3 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the A290 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-3 grades vs the A290 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony A290
| E-3 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-3
| A290 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 | February 2008 | Newer by 28 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony A290
| E-3 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 features exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 and the A290.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and A290 is 56 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and A290.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A290 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2010-06-09 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $670 | $600 |