Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
66 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-3 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the A290 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-3 grades vs the A290 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony A290
| E-3 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-3
| A290 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 | February 2008 | Newer by 28 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony A290
| E-3 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 features exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Sony A290 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-3 and the A290.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and A290 is 56 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and A290.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A290 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-3 vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2010-06-09 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $670 | $600 |