Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-3 versus Sony QX10, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and QX10 (18MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and QX10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-3 was announced 6 years before the QX10 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-3 grades versus the QX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony QX10
| E-3 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 2.5" | " | Bigger screen (+2.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus E-3
| QX10 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2013 | February 2008 | Newer by 67 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony QX10
| E-3 | QX10 |
|---|
Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 comes with outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sony QX10 has measurements of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 versus Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-3 and the QX10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and QX10 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and QX10.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony QX10 will render greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-3 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 105 gr (0.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $670 | $250 |