Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000
56 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
93 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-3 and Sony S2000, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is very similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was brought out 22 months earlier than the S2000 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-3 matches up vs the S2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony S2000
| E-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-3
| S2000 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony S2000
| E-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 features exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 and Sony S2000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-3 compared to the S2000.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and S2000 is 56 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The image here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and S2000.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-3 includes the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field easier. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $670 | $225 |