Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-30 was launched 3 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-30 grades versus the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-30 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-30
TG-820 iHS | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-30 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-30 vs the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93a03/93a0394815d9abd7370c6ae80a09d103bc9ee356" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and TG-820 iHS is 60 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ea8a/8ea8ab728af047dc35e8f007eb4f71d82fead08a" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-30 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical MP albeit different sensor sizing. The E-30 comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed2f7/ed2f71404e11eee43b64e33e8d8d9d93f1ad5e5e" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c536/0c5360808605b6e6f2a9988ca17de96d4e97581e" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | 220 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,299 | $500 |