Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-30 was brought out 5 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-30 scores against the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-30 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-30
TG-2 iHS | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 51 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-30 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 enjoys exterior measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-30 and the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/492e6/492e692d10f693b8f03195c1ede407e8ae11272f" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and TG-2 iHS is 60 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d463/0d46379b8d82947566b7ba487c100942fa71132e" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The E-30 has got the larger sensor which will make getting bokeh easier. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/036a0/036a0b3c52acc2e6593bd5809a1bc0a3cd7986c3" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1cb8/f1cb82a4fb1b83e21906f8bfd887d7664ec1e2d6" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 610k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,299 | $380 |