Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49


92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

The E-30 was introduced 17 months before the CX4 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-30 grades versus the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh CX4
E-30 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-30
CX4 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4
E-30 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 offers outer measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-30 compared to the CX4.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and CX4 is 60 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and CX4.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-30 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,299 | $211 |