Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Released March 2009
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-30 was introduced 17 months before the CX4 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-30 grades versus the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh CX4

 E-30 CX4 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-30

 CX4 E-30 
AnnouncedAugust 2010March 2009Fresher by 17 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4

 E-30 CX4 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 offers outer measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-30 compared to the CX4.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and CX4 is 60 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and CX4.

All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-30 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography details
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography details
59
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
26
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
72
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-30
Sports photography with Ricoh CX4
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery pack (750 shots)
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (750 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
66
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-30
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX4
52
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (750 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
42
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-30
Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
18
can't record video
30
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus E-30Ricoh CX4
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-30 Ricoh CX4
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-03-24 2010-08-19
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lb) 205 grams (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLM-1 DB-100
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $1,299 $211