Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-30 was brought out 5 years before the GR which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-30 grades versus the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh GR
E-30 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-30
GR | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 49 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR
E-30 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 offers outside measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") and a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-30 vs the GR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/950c5/950c5b2dcc0584f4f07303fb7af2f2345bd2988d" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and GR is 60 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad913/ad91315b6eb720f7122357d0b13fb2cd43012edf" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and GR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-30 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR will offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5ccb/e5ccb88745ab3e6d22824923934f3fd18df9173f" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa5da/aa5dad29943908879d62176512f5eb695f722c7a" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Ricoh GR |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 300s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | 530 | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | 290 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,299 | $971 |