Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50
60 Imaging
47 Features
54 Overall
49
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and WG-50 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-30 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-30 grades vs the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh WG-50
E-30 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus E-30
WG-50 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | March 2009 | Fresher by 99 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh WG-50
E-30 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has exterior measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-30 compared to the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and WG-50 is 60 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and WG-50.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-30 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will render more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $1,299 | $280 |