Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus E-410 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2007
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-410
  • Older Model is Olympus E-400
  • New Model is Olympus E-420
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-410, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the E-410 (10MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was brought out 3 years earlier than the E-410 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-300 matches up against the E-410 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-410

 E-300 E-410 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Olympus E-300

 E-410 E-300 
AnnouncedJune 2007January 2005Fresher by 29 months
Display dimensions2.5"1.8"Larger display (+0.7")
Display resolution215k134kClearer display (+81k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-410

 E-300 E-410 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-410 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-410 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the E-410.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-410 is 67 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-410.

As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-410 to produce extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus E-410
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
56
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus E-410
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-410 Sports photography highlights
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
42
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Olympus E-410 Travel photography info
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (8MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
49
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-410 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
50
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-410 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-410
 Olympus E-300Olympus E-410
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus E-410
Other name EVOLT E-300 EVOLT E-410
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2005-01-10 2007-06-14
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 45
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 134k dots 215k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 435 gr (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 51
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 494
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $800 -