Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
 
               
              80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was launched 13 years before the E-M10 III which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-300 matches up against the E-M10 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| E-300 | E-M10 III | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-300
| E-M10 III | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2017 |  | January 2005 | More modern by 153 months | 
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen | 
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | 
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 134k | Crisper screen (+906k dot) | 
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate | 
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M10 III
| E-300 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | 
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the E-M10 III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-M10 III is 67 and 80 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-M10 III.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus E-M10 III to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
 
          Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
        
                
        Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | 
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - | 
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless | 
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2017-08-31 | 
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII | 
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds | 
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm | 
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 | 
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 | 
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 | 
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 121 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds | 
| Total lenses | 45 | 107 | 
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 | 
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting | 
| Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches | 
| Screen resolution | 134k dots | 1,040k dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots | 
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent | 
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs | 
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs | 
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes | 
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | 
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 
| Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 | 
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images | 
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | - | BLS-50 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | 
| Card slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Pricing at launch | $800 | $650 | 


