Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was revealed 7 years before the TG-310 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-300 grades versus the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-300
| TG-310 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2005 | More modern by 72 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-310
| E-300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-300 compared to the TG-310.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-310 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-310.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-310 will result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $800 | $0 |