Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was revealed 7 years before the TG-310 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-300 grades versus the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-310

 E-300 TG-310 
Focus manually More precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-300

 TG-310 E-300 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2005More modern by 72 months
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-310

 E-300 TG-310 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-300 compared to the TG-310.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-310 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-310.

Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-310 will result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography details
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
33
decent MP (14MP)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Olympus TG-310 Street photography information
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography highlights
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment sealing
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
39
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
9
can't record video
32
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus E-300Olympus TG-310
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus TG-310
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2005-01-10 2011-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.20 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $800 $0