Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was released 7 years prior to the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 matches up versus the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VR-320
E-300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-300
VR-320 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 79 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-320
E-300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe95b/fe95b9b43f9f093c3cae59e65d2eec8ac35b9e0f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be68a/be68a580f4e11761d7fe5d9063365e85ebad8adc" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36a5d/36a5d7fc35896ee695e06380d6cfe759362e8723" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b085/3b085ee6d4788416eb8c5769f372ffe6b7aacb57" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus VR-320 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $800 | $179 |