Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Updated by Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was released 7 years prior to the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 matches up versus the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-300 VR-320 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-300

 VR-320 E-300 
AnnouncedJuly 2011January 2005More recent by 79 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kClearer screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-320

 E-300 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the VR-320.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and VR-320.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
MP count low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition (158 grams)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
32
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than competition (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus E-300Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus VR-320
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2011-07-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $800 $179