Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the VR-330 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-300 VR-330 
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-300

 VR-330 E-300 
LaunchedFebruary 2011January 2005More recent by 74 months
Screen dimension3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kClearer screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330

 E-300 VR-330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the VR-330.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and VR-330 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and VR-330.

As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will produce more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
33
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging advice
9
no video recording
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-300Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus VR-330
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-01-10 2011-02-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $800 $220