Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the VR-330 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus VR-330
E-300 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-300
VR-330 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | January 2005 | More recent by 74 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330
E-300 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the VR-330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and VR-330 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and VR-330.
As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will produce more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus VR-330 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $800 | $220 |